header-logo header-logo

14 August 2008
Issue: 7334 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Wage enforcement required

Service industry under pressure to meet minimum wage standards

The government may face difficulty in enforcing a ban on employers using tips and service charges to meet the national minimum wage, say lawyers.

Speaking at the 10th anniversary of the introduction of the minimum wage, Business Secretary John Hutton announced that the government intends to close the loophole allowing service industries to use tips to supplement wages to bring them in line with the statutory minimum. Hutton said: “When people leave a tip, in a restaurant or elsewhere, they expect it to go to service staff and as consumers, we’ve got a right to know if that actually happens.”

Diane Parker, partner at Atherton Godfrey solicitors, says: “The government, whilst well meaning, with may well have difficulty enforcing these proposed changes, other than leaving it to employees to enforce their own rights in the employment tribunal.”

Parker says that most breaches are picked up by HM Customs and Revenue for PAYE purposes, with those found guilty being made subject to fines and prosecutions. Difficulties exist, however, in identifying where employees are receiving tips in addition to the national minimum wage because the employer is putting the tips through the PAYE system.

“Given that many who work in service industries where tips are commonplace, tend to be short term, often new immigrants or even those working on visas, leaving them to take their case to employment tribunals as the only enforcement method will continue to leave such employees vulnerable to abuse, because either they are not aware of or are unable to seek advice on their rights,” Parker adds.

Issue: 7334 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll