The case, Cape Intermediate Holdings v Dring [2019] UKSC 38, [2019] All ER (D) 161 (Jul), concerns the principle of ‘open justice’ and has wide-ranging implications for disclosure. Graham Dring, on behalf of the Asbestos Victims Support Groups Forum UK, applied to access documents, which were due to be destroyed, from a legal case against asbestos manufacturer Cape. He believed they contained valuable information about the dangers of asbestos.
Giving the lead judgment, Lady Hale said: ‘The default position should be to grant access to documents placed before a judge and referred to by a party at trial unless there was a good reason not to do so. It should not be limited by what the judge has chosen to read.’
Harminder Bains, partner at law firm Leigh Day, who worked pro bono on the case, said: ‘This is a landmark decision for access to documents to non-parties and a victory for open justice.’
.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=e3c4b2f1_1)
