header-logo header-logo

Updated Equal Treatment Bench Book

01 March 2018
Issue: 7783 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

An updated Equal Treatment Bench Book (ETBB) has now been published. The ETBB provides guidance to judges on how to make the court experience more accessible for a range of court users. This latest version has a greatly expanded chapter on litigants in person and an expanded glossary on disability and suggested court adjustments. It includes new sections on antisemitism, Islamophobia, modern slavery, refugees and asylum seekers, women’s experiences of social media, veterans and mental health, English as a second language, effective use of interpreters, wearing the veil in court and obesity. It is available online here.

Issue: 7783 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll