header-logo header-logo

An unwelcome intrusion?

11 June 2009 / Rebecca Newitt
Issue: 7373 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

When is media attendance in court intrusive? asks Rebecca Newitt

The Family Proceedings (Amendment) (No 2) Rules 2009 (SI 2009/857) came into force on 27 April 2009. The new rules govern who may be present during a hearing in proceedings which are held in private.

The only exceptions to this, by virtue of r 10.28 (1), are hearings conducted for the purpose of judicially assisted conciliation or negotiations. This will, of course, include financial dispute resolution hearings.

In particular, the rules allow “duly accredited representatives of news gathering and reporting organisations”, in accordance with the UK Press Card Authority Scheme, to be present, subject to a power of the court to direct their exclusion from all or part of the proceedings for one of the reasons specified in r 10.28 (4). The media may be excluded where the court is satisfied that:
a) This is necessary:
i) in the interests of any child concerned in, or connected with, proceedings;
ii) for the safety or protection of a party, a witness in the proceedings, or a person connected with such

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll