header-logo header-logo

05 November 2015
Issue: 7675 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Unlimited fines for corporate offences

Sentencing guidelines will “send a chill through corporate UK”

Companies face a hike in fines from next February for health and safety, food safety and hygiene offences, and corporate manslaughter.

New Sentencing Council guidelines, published this week and due to take effect on 1 February 2016, provide for unlimited fines and a starting point of £7.5m on organisations with a turnover of more than £50m, for corporate manslaughter. Smaller organisations with a turnover of up to £2m could face a fine of £450,000 or more.

The guidelines cover offences committed by organisations and individuals in the course of their professional lives only. The guidelines must be followed unless the judge or magistrate believes this would not be in the interests of justice. However, judges will also be asked to take into account the offending organisation’s profit margin, and the impact the sentence may have on its employees and on its ability to make restitution to victims.

Fines for organisations committing food safety offences range from £100 to £3m, depending on severity and level of culpability. For individuals who breach safety and food hygiene regulations, the penalty could be up to two years in custody or/and an unlimited fine.

Gerard Forlin QC, of Cornerstone Barristers, says the guidelines will “send a chill through corporate UK”.

“Many defendants, particularly larger ones and individuals, will feel it unfair that a sentence imposed on 1 February 2016 could be, say ten times higher than for the same offence on 31 January 2016. This will make the advising of corporations and individuals very difficult for lawyers, and I envisage many procedural difficulties and hurdles will need to be overcome by the courts, particularly in the early stages.”

Jon Cooper, partner at Bond Dickinson LLP, says: “In the majority of cases, fines for health and safety offences will go through the roof. For example, a recent prosecution of Baxters Food Group Limited resulting in a fine of £60,000 for a non-fatal accident might, under the new guidance, increase to a fine between £550,000 and £2.9m.”

Laura Cameron, partner at Pinsent Masons, says: “Many of those currently subject to proceedings may be well advised to enter early guilty pleas in appropriate cases in order to expedite their cases.”

 
Issue: 7675 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll