header-logo header-logo

20 September 2007
Issue: 7298 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

United action planned to fight legal aid reform

News

Criminal lawyer groups have agreed to join forces and speak with one voice—led by the Law Society—when negotiating with the Legal Services Commission  (LSC) over legal aid reforms. The united action will kick off with a national demonstration on Monday 5 November.

In a statement the London Criminal Courts Solicitors’ Association, Criminal Law Solicitors’ Association, Criminal Defence Solicitors Union, Association of Major London Criminal Law Firms and Independent Lawyers Group say they will be part of a single negotiating team with an agreed set of objectives.
“We want this to be a transparent process, and to ensure that there will be no separate bilateral meetings between any organisation and the LSC and government without the negotiating team being kept informed,” the group says.

The move comes after the LSC announced the determination of the general criminal contract, with new contracts to be dated from 14 January 2008 for a period of six months. There will be an invitation to express an interest and only firms that respond will be considered for a contract.

Contracts will be awarded if lawyers continue to meet the “contractual requirements” and accept all the changes but the contract will be for only a six-month period, to be followed by a move to the existing unified contract in July 2008.

A further consultation paper on best value tendering will be issued and the LSC’s final proposals on the graduated litigator fee scheme are yet to be announced. The LSC still intends to impose on 14 January 2008: fixed fees in the police station; graduated litigators fees in the Crown court (subject to the outcome of the consultation); a new very high cost cases panel; the routing of all calls via the defence solicitor call centre; and the expansion of Criminal Defence Service Direct.

The action group says: “Our associations have been informed by many of their owner members that they feel unable to continue to provide out of hours services in the police station due to the constraints of underfunding. Pending the regional and London meetings, and the advice of the Law Society, the professional associations urge you all not to take any steps to indicate interest in future contracting on unfair and uneconomic terms.”

The LSC says it is confident that the majority of firms will sign up to the new criminal contract in January, adding that if firms do not register for a new criminal contract their work will be reallocated to “other providers who have expressed an interest in expansion”.

Issue: 7298 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll