header-logo header-logo

29 March 2018 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7787 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Unfair dismissal: protecting your brood

nlj_7787_pigott

Anomalies persist in the protection of pregnant women against dismissal, as Charles Pigott explains

  • According to current domestic case law, pregnant women continue to enjoy weaker protection while still at work compared to those already on maternity leave.
  • An opportunity to address this anomaly at a EU level was recently passed up by the European Court of Justice.

In Really Easy Car Credit v Thompson UKEAT 0197/17/0301 (unreported) the Employment Appeal Tribunal has confirmed that an employer must have actual knowledge of an employee’s pregnancy for a claim for pregnancy-related automatically unfair dismissal to succeed. It has also reiterated the orthodox position that an employer is not obliged to revisit a decision to dismiss once it becomes of aware of the pregnancy.

Domestic law

Leaving aside the provisions of the Equality Act relating to maternity and sex discrimination, the relevant law applying in Britain can be found in a combination of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA) and the Maternity and Parental Leave etc Regulations 1999 (SI 1999/3312) (MPL).

Under regulation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll