header-logo header-logo

17 February 2021 / David Renton
Issue: 7921 / Categories: Opinion , Housing , Covid-19 , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail

Housing law reform: Under pressure

39775
David Renton reports on the current status of the evictions ban & the growing pressure on government to act on its promises of housing law reform

Before 21 February 2021, the government will need to decide whether or not to extend the current ban on tenant evictions.

Contained in the Public Health (Coronavirus) (Protection from Eviction) (England) Regulations 2021 (SI 2021/15) the ban currently prohibits bailiffs from delivering a notice of eviction or executing a warrant of possession, save where certain exceptions apply: if the underlying possession was granted against trespassers, or was granted on grounds of anti-social behaviour, or the case involved arrears equivalent to six months’ or more rent.

Introduced during the second lockdown in November 2020, the present eviction ban is narrower than the original eviction ban made in March 2020, which did not merely limit bailiff attendance but also prohibited possession and eviction hearings.

Such hearings began again in the autumn and have continued through the present lockdown. The result is that a bottleneck

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll