header-logo header-logo

Under placement orders

25 September 2008
Issue: 7338 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Dorothea Gartland considers the impact of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 on placement orders

The decision of the Court of Appeal in Re B (children) [2008] EWCA Civ 835, [2008] All ER (D) 228 (Jul) offers advice and guidance to local authorities in respect of placement order applications. In this case the parents appealed against care orders made in respect of their children and a placement order in respect of the youngest child.

The local authority's adoption panel had met and considered the case of the youngest child but without having read the reports of two experts instructed in the case, a psychologist and child and adolescent psychiatrist. The local authority's director of social services endorsed the panel's decision the day after the panel and the local authority applied straight away for a placement order in respect of the youngest child. The parents sought an adjournment of the final hearing to enable the panel to reconsider the case having had sight of the experts' reports. The judge refused this application and made care orders and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll