header-logo header-logo

Under one roof

30 October 2008
Issue: 7343 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Geraldine Morris looks at the implications of the Civil Partnership Act 2004

Family practitioners are generally aware that the Civil Partnership Act 2004 (CPA 2004) introduced provisions in relation to dissolution, nullity and separation orders largely equivalent to those set out in the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) regarding divorce, nullity and judicial separation. Equally, the provisions of the CPA 2004 regarding financial provision correspond with those for divorcing spouses under MCA 1973.

CPA 2004 is, however, a carefully drafted and comprehensive piece of legislation. It includes provisions in relation to remedies corresponding to those available to divorcing spouses under other legislation. In addition, although CPA 2004 has been in force since 2005, the lack of reported case law relating to civil partnership has led to a lack of up-to-date current awareness of civil partnership and the impact that reported divorce proceedings or different sex cohabitant cases may have upon civil partnership dissolution, ancillary relief and non civil partnership same sex relationships. Some of the areas where there are corresponding or comparable provisions which could be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
back-to-top-scroll