header-logo header-logo

An uncertain future?

02 October 2008
Issue: 7339 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Should the English anti-suit injunction expect another blow from the ECJ? Steven Friel reports

Imagine the following scenario. An English company (UK Co) has entered into a contract with a company (Euro Co) from a far-flung European country (eg Estonia, Bulgaria, Italy, Finland, Poland, or indeed any other of the 26 other member states). Wary of potentially having to litigate in an unfamiliar jurisdiction, UK Co insists upon an English arbitration clause in the contract. Euro Co agrees to this, and their contract duly provides for all disputes to be settled in arbitration before a sole arbitrator in London, applying English law and proceeding in the English language. So far, all fine.

Six months down the line, however, and the parties are in dispute. Euro Co considers that UK Co has breached the contract. Rather than commencing London arbitration, however, Euro Co commences an action in courts in Euro Co’s home jurisdiction.

In these circumstances, can an English court issue an anti-suit injunction restraining Euro Co from proceeding in its home jurisdiction in breach of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll