header-logo header-logo

21 October 2010
Issue: 7438 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

UK business hit by disputes

Senior corporate counsel are looking for ways to control their litigation costs following a surge in court actions, regulatory proceedings and arbitrations.

The annual Litigation Trends Survey by Fulbright & Jaworski International LLP reveals a sharp rise in activity. Nearly one-third of UK businesses say they faced a regulatory proceeding in the last year, compared with nine per cent in the previous survey. Respondents say they expect this trend to continue.

Lista Cannon, managing partner of Fulbright’s London office, says: “The potential ramifications of a regulatory investigation can be extremely severe on both sides of the Atlantic. 

“Recently, businesses have been subject to increasingly large fines. Senior management are under close scrutiny and face significant criminal penalties. Regulatory proceedings can also adversely affect a company’s share price and increasingly are a precursor to litigation against the company.”

Half of UK companies say they have had at least one court action commenced against them in the previous year, and 16% of UK companies say this involved more than US$20m. One in four (26%) businesses say they expect an increase in legal disputes in the next 12 months.

Nearly one-third of UK companies have had an arbitration commenced against them and one-quarter have filed an arbitration proceeding in the last year, more than double the number in the previous year.

 

Issue: 7438 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll