header-logo header-logo

07 February 2008 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7307 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

The two Vladimirs

…and the cloud cuckoo land of legal nit-picking, by Geoffrey Bindman
 

An unusual libel case came my way in the late 1980s. Vladimir Matusevitch had been sued and the trial had taken place in his absence. He was facing a demand for damages of £65,000, plus costs. He became aware of this only when a bailiff called to seize his possessions. I was able to get a stay of execution. Matusevitch was a journalist employed by Radio Free Europe to broadcast to the Soviet Union, where strict control of local media denied the population accurate information about what was going on in the world.

 
RECRUITMENT POLICY
His opponent, Vladimir Telnikoff, had been employed at one time by the BBC Russian Service to do much the same thing. The Daily Telegraph on 18 February 1984 published an article by Telnikoff, “Selecting the Right Wavelength to Tune into Russia”, in which he complained that these Western efforts were ineffective in turning the Russian people against their rulers.
Telnikoff argued
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll