header-logo header-logo

12 December 2018
Issue: 7821 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Tweet tweet, say lawyers

Time to take a strategic approach to social media

The legal Twitterati and LinkedIn users lead the social media field among lawyers, a report shows.

Both sites were rated highest in terms of influence and effectiveness by law firms and chambers surveyed by NLJ in association with legal PR consultancy Kysen. They were followed by Facebook and Instagram, while other platforms flagged up included Pinterest, Google+, WeChat, Snapchat and Paper.li, a content curation service.

Respondents also highlighted legal platform Juriosity, which offers a knowledge network and professional directory.

Catherine Calder, joint CEO of Serjeants’ Inn Chambers and co-chair of the Legal Practice Management Association, said: ‘It is the new shop window.

‘Previously, the news page on our website was our key platform for knowledge-sharing and announcing chambers’ developments. Now we push everything out via social media.

‘It is clear from both the engagement statistics and from anecdotal evidence that that this is how we are reaching clients and contacts.’

However, different platforms have different uses, she said. While Twitter helps law firms and chambers connect with students, pupils and legal commentators, LinkedIn is a better platform for clients, with posts ‘leading directly to new work’.

The report advises taking a strategic approach to social media, as would be the case with any other communications. For example, they should ‘think logically through who your target audiences are and what you need to be saying to them to achieve your aims’, according to Fred Banning, head of corporate communications at Pinsent Mason. Combining press coverage in the still-powerful traditional press with social media activity to push the message out works very well.

There are also risks—innocent-seeming posts can go spectacularly wrong; hastily typed out tweets can go viral. The survey found that some firms are closing their Twitter accounts or tightening up their monitoring and setting clear policies so staff are accountable.

The full report, written by journalist Grania Langdon-Down, is published by NLJ this week, and available as a PDF below.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll