header-logo header-logo

TV COURTING

27 September 2007
Issue: 7290 / Categories: Legal News , Media , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

In brief

Broadcasters are pressing the government to make a decision over whether or not it will allow TV cameras into British courtrooms. The broadcasters, including BBC, ITV, ITN, Channel 4, Five and Sky, have teamed up and written to the secretary of state for justice, Jack Straw, demanding a decision. The government finished consulting on the issue in March 2005 and Lord Falconer was due to make an announcement on whether to allow any changes before the end of June 2005. But, despite mounting pressure from the Broadcasters’ Court TV Group, no decision has been made.

Issue: 7290 / Categories: Legal News , Media , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll