header-logo header-logo

07 November 2017
Issue: 7769 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Trouble in paradise

Lawyers have mounted a robust attack on suggestions offshore schemes are unlawful or ‘nefarious’, following the Paradise Papers leak.

German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung obtained millions of documents concerning the offshore finances of corporations and individuals, from the offshore law firm Appleby and from corporate registries in the Caribbean.

The leak is smaller than 2016’s Panama Papers leak, but sheds light on the secretive world of offshore finance. For example, it reveals the Queen’s private estate invested £10m offshore and Apple avoided tax by moving one of its firms to Jersey.

Many politicians expressed outrage—Labour Leader Jeremy Corbyn called on those who invest offshore to avoid tax to apologise.

However, Miles Dean, managing partner of Milestone International Tax, said: ‘It would be very surprising if the affairs of those individuals concerned were illegal or nefarious.

‘It is the theft of the papers that is illegal. Just because an individual makes an investment that is based offshore does not mean that they have done anything wrong—if they fail to disclose it (and the return they make) on their tax return then that’s tax evasion. But to make the quantum leap and suggest that everyone from the Queen to Bono is dodging tax because some of their investments are made via Bermuda, Cayman or Malta is stupidity on a grand scale.’

Appleby said, in a statement: ‘The journalists do not allege, nor could they, that Appleby has done anything unlawful.

‘There is no wrongdoing. We wish to reiterate that our firm was not the subject of a leak but of a serious criminal act. This was an illegal computer hack.’

Issue: 7769 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll