header-logo header-logo

Trouble brewing over Equalities Bill proposals

03 July 2008
Issue: 7328 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Legal news

 The government will have an uphill struggle persuading businesses to embrace the proposals for the Equalities Bill, lawyers predict.

Proposed measures for the Bill, which is expected to be published in October, would allow employers to discriminate in favour of female or ethnic minority job candidates and ban contractual prohibitions on staff discussing pay with each other.

Pinsent Masons partner, Ashley Norman, says: “Unless there are clear guidelines as to how a business could positively discriminate in certain circumstances, businesses will probably continue as normal.”

Rachel Dineley, employment partner at Beachcroft LLP says: “The government will need to ensure the amendments to the existing law don’t simply create uncertainty, with a whole raft of new questions around the possible interpretations of key wordings.”

She says one of the most significant anticipated changes is the requirement for all public sector bodies—and those firms with public sector contracts—to publish figures showing the gender pay gap.

“Although they will not need to publish actual figures—just the percentage difference—this could have an enormous impact on employers as it will create extra work at a time when resources may already be stretched, and may well cause tensions in the workplace.”

She says the age discrimination proposals could significantly affect healthcare and insurance provision.

“The refusal of some types of cover simply on the basis of age may become a thing of the past. However, higher insurance premiums for older people will continue to be allowed where justified.

“…the new Bill may go much further than originally expected, in requiring the provision of expensive treatments to the elderly where these have previously been refused, on the grounds of their age. This is likely to present the medical profession with difficult ethical dilemmas, where funds and resources are limited and choices between patients have to be made and priorities determined.”

Issue: 7328 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll