header-logo header-logo

Tribunals

07 March 2014
Issue: 7597 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Eclipse Film Partners No. 35 Llp v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2014] EWCA Civ 184, [2014] All ER (D) 247 (Feb)

It did not follow that, because the First-Tier Tribunal (the FTT) had power to make a case management direction which had costs consequences, it had power to make an order that one or both parties bear the costs of compliance. While many case management decisions would have the consequence of imposing a costs burden on one or both parties, the order made in the instant case, that the costs of preparing the bundles be shared had been an order in respect of costs, within the meaning of r 10(1) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009 (SI 2009/273) and, thus, outwith the power of the FTT. The order had been caught by r 10 of the rules notwithstanding that it had been made during the course of the preparation of the proceedings, rather than after the proceedings had been determined.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll