header-logo header-logo

Trial technology (Pt 1)

29 March 2018 / Helen Pugh , Michael Fletcher
Issue: 7787 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Technology
printer mail-detail
nlj_7787_cover_0

In the first part of a new series Michael Fletcher & Helen Pugh roadtest technology at trial

  • Technological advances are changing the way in which trials are conducted.
  • Real-time transcription is particularly well-established and is an invaluable tool.
  • E-bundles and the electronic presentation of evidence have the biggest potential.

It is impossible to ignore the impact of technology on modern life. The disruptive change which technology has brought to many industries such as the taxi and minicab industry has often occurred swiftly. So too the benefits to consumers: ten years ago, no lawyer could have arrived at court via Uber, because the company did not exist.

In contrast, the pace of technological change in the court room has been slow. The concept of ‘paperless trials’ has been around for many years, but they are (at best) rare at county court level. It is only in this decade that significant High Court trials have, sometimes, started to use electronic bundles. While the Rolls Building in London was opened

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll