header-logo header-logo

Transferring weight

20 November 2014 / John McMullen
Issue: 7631 / Categories: Features , TUPE , Employment
printer mail-detail
mcmullen

John McMullen covers recent cases & developments in the law on TUPE

This year has provided us with a number of interesting TUPE cases, ranging from service provision change, and the timing of a TUPE transfer, to issues of communication by a transferor to the new, transferee, employer.

When service provision change does not apply

Horizon Security Services Limited v (1) Ndeze (2) The PCS Group UKEAT/0071/14/JOJ gives us two illustrations where a service provision change TUPE transfer (Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/246), reg 3 (1) (b)) may not apply.

In this case, PCS, a security contractor, had been engaged to provide security services for Workspace Plc, which was looking after a business centre on a site owned by the London Borough of Waltham Forest. Then the site was taken back by the London Borough of Waltham Forest, who engaged a new security company, Horizon, specifically to look after the site for a limited period of eight to nine months pending demolition of the building for the purposes of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll