header-logo header-logo

Trainees see pay reduced

31 May 2018
Issue: 7795 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Average salaries for trainees have dropped since the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) abandoned the minimum trainee salary in 2014.

Pay dropped on average by £560 per year, mainly due to a drop in the salary of the lowest earning trainees, according to SRA analysis of data on the 33,000 trainee solicitors between 2011 and 2016.

However, the reduction in salary coincided with a growth in the number of training contracts offered. It is not clear from the research whether the removal of the minimum salary contributed to this or had no effect at all. Three-quarters of trainees and 82% of firms thought the change had no impact.

Paul Philip, SRA Chief Executive said: ‘It is encouraging that the number of trainees continues to grow and that they are more positive about their futures.’

Issue: 7795 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll