header-logo header-logo

Trade marks up in smoke

13 April 2007 / Denise Mcfarland
Issue: 7268 / Categories: Features , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Mastercigars has unravelled the complexities of parallel importation, says Denise McFarland

A recent Court of Appeal decision in which the issue of parallel importation of trade marked goods was reviewed has resulted in a decision packed with common sense and demystification of a complex area of EU law. The judgment was handed down on 8 March 2007 in Mastercigars Direct Ltd v Hunters & Frankau Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 176, [2007] All ER (D) 132 (Mar). The goods in issue were consignments of habanos, which are hand-made Cuban cigars. It was alleged at trial that the consignments were counterfeit, and amounted to trade mark infringement, as unlawful parallel imports.

 At first instance [2006] EWHC 410 (Ch), [2006] All ER (D) 159 (Mar), Judge Michael Fysh QC, sitting as a High Court judge, gave a lengthy judgment. The trial lasted 16 days. Judge Fysh concluded that the major part had been dealing with the counterfeit issues. These allegations were dismissed and were not the subject of any appeal.

Practical decision

The question

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll