header-logo header-logo

Town & country planning

18 September 2015
Issue: 7668 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Obar Camden Ltd v Camden London Borough Council [2015] EWHC 2475 (Admin), [2015] All ER (D) 37 (Sep)

The claimant sought judicial review of the defendant local planning authority’s grant of planning permission, authorising change of use from a public house to alternative uses. The planning court, in allowing the application, held that the authority had erred and that it was not possible to say that it was highly likely that the outcome for the claimant would not have been substantially different if the conduct complained of had not occurred.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll