header-logo header-logo

01 February 2013 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7546 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

A touch of brilliance?

As a new legal services provider enters the market, Jon Robins investigates how the profession is responding to change

In the week that saw the emergence of Brilliant Law, the most exciting development in the newly liberalised world since the last one, a “super-survey” revealed the not very surprising picture that life for much of the incumbent profession was far from brilliant.

Research published by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), Law Society and Legal Services Board (LSB)—heavyweight “both literally and metaphorically”, according to a Law Society Gazette editorial—concluded that recession and structural changes were “combining to create a turbulent environment” for the solicitors’ profession.

Triple whammy

No news there, then. The Gazette suggested a profession coping well with an “unprecedented triple whammy” and “making a pretty good go of it”. Well, that’s one way of reading it.

The report’s authors described the position of private practice firms’ as “increasingly precarious”. “The recession has had a significant impact on demand for legal services,” said Professor Pascoe Pleasence, Dr Nigel Balmer

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll