header-logo header-logo

11 May 2017
Issue: 7745 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Toolkit to defeat human traffickers

HSF provides pro bono assistance to create practical toolkit

European banks and financial institutions have been given a practical toolkit to help them fight human trafficking.

The toolkit, launched last week by the European Bankers Alliance and the Thompson Reuters Foundation, was created with the pro bono legal assistance of a team at Herbert Smith Freehills (HSF). It includes a set of ‘red flag indicators’, case studies and resources to help financial institutions detect and report unusual behaviour or suspicious patterns in financial activity. It draws inspiration from a similar project in the US but the picture in Europe is very different.

While both the UK and the US are mainly destination countries, eastern Europe produces a vast number of trafficking victims, and Italy and other central European states are transit countries. The wide range of different laws and regulations across Europe must also be considered.

After being approached to work on the project in late 2015, HSF studied the issue, drew up proposals for discussion and joined a working group to review and test the indicators. The toolkit has now been shared on a confidential basis with financial institutions, NGOs and law enforcement agencies.

Human trafficking is a pro bono focus for HSF, which drew up a global ‘Accountability Hub’ for the NGO, Focus on Labour Exploitation (FLEX), and also provides substantial assistance to Anti-Slavery International.

Dan Hudson, partner at HSF, said: 'Financial institutions can play a key role in identifying activity related to the trafficking and exploitation of men, women and children. It is only through collaboration that we will tackle this issue and it is good to see that financial institutions are taking the lead in this fight. This toolkit is a very positive step forward and we are pleased to be part of this initiative.'

Issue: 7745 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll