header-logo header-logo

Time to change the rules?

16 December 2011 / Elizabeth Fitzgerald , John Summers
Issue: 7494 / Categories: Features , Family , Property
printer mail-detail

John Summers & Elizabeth Fitzgerald examine two recent judgments that challenge long-established property law rules

Trusts of the family home are the common law’s itch that won’t go away. When will residential property owned in one person’s name, or in more than one name, nevertheless respectively be owned in equity jointly, or on some basis other than as joint tenants? The question is pressing as the number of unmarried couples who acquire property without giving clear thought, or expression, to its ownership, rockets.

Beneficial interests

In Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17, [2007] 2 AC 432 the House of Lords went some way towards relaxing the rules governing the assessment of beneficial interests. Lady Hale’s judgment adopted a holistic approach to the assessment of certain claims to shared beneficial ownership. The nature of that holistic enquiry has now been examined by the Supreme Court in Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53, [2011] All ER (D) 64 (Nov).

Stack: a recap

Stack concerned a property held in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll