header-logo header-logo

16 March 2018 / Kim Harrison
Issue: 7785 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Time for change

nlj_7785_harrison

Kim Harrison discusses consent & the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority in relation to child sexual exploitation

  • Sufferers of child sexual exploitation now being recognised as genuine victims

  • Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority still behind the times and subject of much criticism.

  • Revised guidance issued on 31 October 2017 was welcomed, but the risk of victims being unfairly denied compensation remains.

Society’s perception of victims of child sexual exploitation (CSE) has greatly changed over the past decade. Victims of this crime are no longer routinely labelled ‘child prostitutes’ making a ‘lifestyle choice’ – instead police, CPS, social services and other agencies are recognising these children as genuine victims of sexual abuse and exploitation. Much progress has also been made in prosecuting perpetrators and successful civil claims have also been brought on behalf of CSE survivors against local authorities and other agencies who failed them.

The Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA), however, has been slow to catch up. The CICA is a government funded body which pays compensation to victims of ‘crimes of violence’ if

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll