header-logo header-logo

01 November 2013 / Khawar Qureshi KC
Issue: 7582 / Categories: Features , Arbitration , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Time for change?

013_nlj_7582_specialist_commercial_quershi

In the first of two leading articles, Khawar Qureshi QC puts ethics in international arbitration under the spotlight

This two-part article provides a summary of the rules and guidelines applicable to both arbitrators and counsel in international arbitration, along with examples of how these rules and guidelines have been applied in practice, and considers whether further regulation is needed.

The term “ethics” in this article is defined broadly as the “rules of conduct recognised in respect to a particular class of human actions of a particular group”.

Given the international nature of arbitration, and the differing cultural or contextual expectations of parties, as well as counsel, some commentators reject the contention that a uniform code of “ethics” can be applicable.

Nevertheless, precisely because some degree of uniformity is required to provide a measure of consistency and predictability (not to mention order), institutional rules which govern the arbitral process seek to define its parameters, while leaving the arbitrators with broad discretion to ensure that flexibility is maintained.

IBA

The International Bar Association

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll