header-logo header-logo

23 June 2021
Issue: 7938 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , EU , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Thousands could miss settled status deadline

Solicitors have warned EU citizens, including vulnerable children and care leavers, will be stripped of essential rights next week unless they take urgent action

Midnight on 30 June is the deadline for applications for EU settled status (EUSS).

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘Anyone who does not apply by the deadline will become unlawfully resident in the UK overnight.

‘They will be at risk of losing their jobs, bank accounts, tenancies, access to the NHS and welfare benefits.’

As of 23 April, however, applications had still not been received for 33% of the 3,660 looked after children and care leavers identified as eligible to apply for EU settled status, according to a Home Office survey.

Boyce said solicitors are continuing to inform the Law Society that many clients who are eligible have no idea they need to register under the scheme―indicating a far wider group across society who don’t appreciate the impending shift in their status.

Some mistakenly believe they do not need to apply, including those with permanent residence but not citizenship and parents who wrongly believe their children are automatically UK citizens because they were born in the UK.

Boyce said: ‘Solicitors working for local authorities are concerned about the responsibilities local authorities owe to these and other EU and EEA citizens who have not applied for the scheme in time for the deadline.

‘This would leave them unable to access state support. Local authorities require increased guidance and resources for making human rights assessments to be able to support an unprecedented number of vulnerable people from becoming destitute.

‘Clear contingency plans are urgently needed to prevent mass disenfranchisement overnight on 30 June. There will inevitably be those who fall through the cracks and the implications for each one of them could be shattering, as the Windrush generation testify.’

 

Issue: 7938 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , EU , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll