header-logo header-logo

Third party funding: a litigation lifeline?

25533
Simon Davenport QC, Daniel Goldblatt & Sergey Litovchenko on finding third party litigation funding in the age of COVID-19

In brief

  • How lawyers and their clients can best position themselves to apply for and negotiate third party litigation funding.

As the COVID-19 pandemic and economic fallout drain liquidity from businesses and individuals, self-financing lawsuits will become increasingly challenging. Meanwhile, the litigation finance industry, which has tended to be non-correlated to financial markets or counter-cyclical, is in a position to provide a lifeline. But with so much demand for cash, funders will become more discerning about which cases they back and will charge more for their services.

Third party funding, otherwise known as litigation funding or finance, is the loaning of capital by a fund or investment firm to cover a party’s legal costs, which is repayable (with a return) in the event of a successful claim. Put crudely; it is paying for litigation when a party has a good case but either cannot

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll