header-logo header-logo

Theresa May up a gum tree

06 May 2016 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7697 / Categories: Features , Public , Brexit
printer mail-detail
nlj_7697_zander

Michael Zander QC on the Home Secretary’s attempt to justify withdrawal from the ECHR while remaining in the EU

Theresa May certainly got a reaction when she urged last week (25 April) that while remaining in the EU, the UK should withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). In her first speech of the EU referendum campaign, Mrs May said we should leave the ECHR because “it can bind the hands of Parliament” and “makes us less secure by preventing the deportation of dangerous foreign nationals”.

She was swiftly and categorically slapped down by Michael Gove, Secretary of State for Justice, the minister in charge of the topic, who told MPs that he agreed with former Attorney General Dominic Grieve. “Both of us believe that we should remain within the European Convention on Human Rights”. His junior minister, Mr Dominic Raab, and the present Attorney General, Mr Jeremy Wright QC, responding to an urgent question in the Commons on 26 April both confirmed that the government’s policy was to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll