header-logo header-logo

The scope of retained EU law: an overview

02 June 2021 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7935 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Employment
printer mail-detail
50388
Charles Pigott explores retained EU law through recent findings from the employment coalface
  • A number of interesting issues in relation to retained EU law have been explored in employment case law over the past few months.

Before examining the first wave of Brexit-related case law in the employment field, it is worth a quick reminder of the overall framework in which our courts have been operating since the beginning of 2021.

At the risk of considerable over-simplification, the key aim of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (EUWA 2018) was to leave the UK with a functioning domestic rule book once it had left the EU. To avoid Brexit creating gaping holes in the areas formerly occupied by EU-derived law, the decision was taken to incorporate the whole body of EU legislation and case law that applied at the point of exit and into domestic law. In order to make this snapshot approach work, it was also necessary to cut the legal ‘conduit pipe’ in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll