header-logo header-logo

The Lugano Convention: a good first step

05 March 2020 / David Greene
Issue: 7877 / Categories: Opinion , Brexit
printer mail-detail
16966
David Greene commends the government’s commitment to Lugano & hopes that similar good sense will prevail in the EU
  • Importance of the government’s decision to accede to the Lugano Convention.
  • The introduction of the Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill.

If there is a litigation god he might come in the form of Michael Gove, at least in the short term, through the prism of the government’s decision to accede to the Lugano Convention. Many may be surprised to hear that this was not in any way a given. Despite earlier commitments it was entirely possible that Lugano might have, through perception, been washed up in the government’s red line against any continuing influence of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). There appeared to be, in certain government circles, the misperception that the CJEU has a direct influence on domestic law through the mechanisms of the Lugano Convention. Further there seemed a suspicion that Lugano is an instrument through which the EU drives

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll