header-logo header-logo

The (new look) solicitor’s equitable lien

01 April 2022 / Anthony Field
Issue: 7973 / Categories: Features , Profession , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
77120
Bott & Co v Ryanair is an important development for access to justice, writes Anthony Field
  • Considers the landmark case on solicitor’s lien, Bott & Co v Ryanair, including at lower courts and Supreme Court, and the reasons for the decision.

On 16 March 2022, the Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision in the case of Bott & Co Solicitors Limited v Ryanair DAC [2022] UKSC 8, [2022] All ER (D) 54 (Mar). The judgment has developed the law of a solicitor’s equitable lien that has existed for more than 200 years and the decision will resonate across the legal profession. It is an important case for access to justice.

The solicitor’s equitable lien

In its traditional form, the solicitor’s equitable lien entitles a solicitor who acts for a client in litigation to recoup their fees out of the money recovered by their client. However, if the opposing party pays the money directly to the client, having been made aware of the solicitor’s entitlement to be paid

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The threat of section 21 ‘no fault’ eviction was banished this week, after the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 passed into law
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
back-to-top-scroll