The development of climate change and environmental, social and governance (ESG) litigation across the world gathers pace but, as evidenced by recent UK decisions, there remain some basic hurdles for campaigners and litigants as they test fundaments of responsibility and liability at law.
Getting claims off the ground
As covered previously in NLJ the court in McGaughey and another v Universities Superannuation Scheme Ltd (USSL) and others [2022] EWHC 1233 (Ch) refused permission for members of the USSL pension scheme to pursue a derivative action against the investment policies of the trustees in relation to fossil fuels (see 'No green light (yet) for climate actions', 172 NLJ 7994, pp9-10), They sought to bring a derivative claim through USSL, not under the procedure for shareholders governed by Pt 11 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006), but at common law as non-shareholders. This will always be a challenge and the court
.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=b21f1aaf_1)
.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=754d0e82_1)
