header-logo header-logo

19 May 2016
Issue: 7699 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Term-time holidays allowed

High Court rules in favour of father who took child out of school

Thousands of cases could be revisited following a High Court ruling that a father can take his child on holiday during the school term.

Jonathan Platt was prosecuted under the Education Act 1996, s 444 for taking his daughter to Disney World during term-time. The case was thrown out by the Isle of Wight Magistrates’ Court and the High Court has now ruled in favour of Platt.

Lord Justice Lloyd and Mrs Justice Thirlwall held that the magistrates were entitled to take the “wider picture” into account when deciding what constitutes “regular attendance” for the purposes of the Act.

The Education (Pupil Registration) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2013 (SI 2013/756) removed headteachers’ discretionary powers to grant up to ten days off per year. Now, exceptional circumstances must apply before children can lawfully be taken out of school in term.

Failing to secure regular attendance is a strict liability offence. A more serious offence exists where a parent knowingly fails to secure regular attendance, and parents can be fined £60-£2,500 or jailed for three months.

Julie Robertson from Simpson Millar solicitors, who acted for Platt, says the decision will “encourage councils to adopt a proportionate and common sense approach before they decide to issue fixed penalties or move to prosecution—processes which have, over the years, placed parents in jeopardy of acquiring a criminal record”.

She says: “This decision gives parents the freedom and comfort to continue to take their children out of school during term time provided that they secure regular attendance on the whole. It is a redefinition of how the law regarding non-attendance at school is applied and that’s a good thing.”

Issue: 7699 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll