header-logo header-logo

Taylor Review found wanting

11 August 2017
Issue: 7758 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail
ofc

A proposal by the Taylor Review into employment practices to make employers pay similar National Insurance contributions for the self-employed as they do for employees might help discourage exploitation, solicitor Stephen Levinson, consultant, Keystone Law, writes in this week’s NLJ. However, he says its proposal to incorporate case law into legislation ‘ignores the appalling complexity that can thus be created’, and renaming ‘workers’ as ‘dependent contractors’ fails to alter anything of substance. Moreover, its recommendation that the law be regularly re-examined reveals ‘little appreciation of the practical difficulty government departments have every year in securing parliamentary time’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

Quinn Emanuel—James McSweeney

London promotion underscores firm’s investment in white collar and investigations

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Ward Hadaway—Louise Miller

Private client team strengthened by partner appointment

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll