header-logo header-logo

Taxing matters

09 January 2015 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7635 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail
vaines_0

Peter Vaines wonders whether the meaning of “discovery” is too wide

If HMRC wish to raise an assessment beyond the enquiry window they must first make a discovery. That means the tax officer has to discover that:

  • there are income and gains which ought to be assessed;
  • an assessment to tax has become insufficient; or
  • a relief which had been given has become excessive.

In these circumstances, Taxes Management Act 1970(TMA 1970), s 29 allows HMRC to raise a discovery assessment—providing certain other conditions are satisfied.

We know from Charlton (and many other authorities) that a discovery means that it has newly appeared to an officer that there is an insufficiency in an assessment. A change of view, a change of opinion or the correction of an oversight is a discovery for this purpose. It can also include a discovery that the law had been wrongly applied or that the officer had made a mistake about the law.

The meaning of “discovery” is therefore extremely wide. However, it must mean something. What

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll