header-logo header-logo

Tattoo taboo

07 June 2007
Issue: 7276 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Human rights
printer mail-detail

In brief

A Blackpool tattoo parlour has had to pay out £2,500 in compensation plus costs for refusing to give a 24-year-old woman a tattoo because she is disabled. Cerebral palsy sufferer, Rachael Monk, who uses a wheelchair and speaks through a Delta Talker, visited Body Creation with her family and requested a tattoo of a fairy on her arm. Owner Jordan Dean told the family: “We don’t do people like that,” before calling in his dad who, according to the judge, adopted an “old-fashioned and highly discriminatory attitude” and offered “gratuitous insults”. The family contacted the Disability Rights Commission, and the case went to court.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll