header-logo header-logo

02 April 2020
Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail

Taking family disputes out of the courtroom

A working group into approaches to child arrangements when parents separate has called for ‘radical change’ in its second report, published this week
The Private Law Working Group (PrLWG), led by Mr Justice Stephen Cobb, began work in 2018 and published its first report in July 2019. Its second report, a detailed 101-page analysis, states: ‘We believe that we have reached a critical point in the evolution of in-court and out-of-court dispute resolution for separating families; the system (such as it is) is not functioning appropriately, and its weakness is exposed by the pressure of the demand placed upon it.

‘Little will be gained by tinkering with the current arrangements. We feel that now is the time to instigate more radical system change for the benefit of future generations.’

Sir Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division, said: ‘While there is always a role for a judge or magistrate sitting in a court room, the report re-ignites an important conversation about services for families, and dispute resolution, out of the courtroom.

‘In reality, of course, difficulties that cause parents to come to court are not always essentially legal matters; they are, very often, the consequences of broken or dysfunctional adult relationships. As this report advises, public education about the effects of parental conflict, and the work of professionals other than lawyers or judges, will be key to supporting families to receive appropriate assistance and support; while the courts remain important for the determination of disputes particularly those involving harm to children or adults, courts should otherwise be seen as the last, rather than the first, port of call when many disputes arise.’

The report, ‘Private law: family disputes. The time for change. The need for change. The case for change’, can be found at https://bit.ly/2xIYI76

 

Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
The legal profession’s claim to be a ‘guardian of fairness’ is under scrutiny after stark findings on gender imbalance and opaque progression. Writing in NLJ this week, Joshua Purser of No5 Barristers’ Chambers and Govindi Deerasinghe of Global 50/50 warn that leadership remains dominated by a narrow elite, with men holding 71% of top court roles
A legal challenge to police disclosure rules has failed, reinforcing a push for transparency in policing. In NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth examines a case where the Metropolitan Police required officers to declare membership of groups like the Freemasons
Bereavement leave is undergoing a quiet but profound transformation. Writing in NLJ this week, Robert Hargreaves of York St John University explains how the Employment Rights Act 2025 introduces a day-one right to leave for a wider range of losses, alongside new provisions for pregnancy loss and bereaved partners
Courts are beginning to grapple with whether AI-generated material is legally privileged—and the answers are mixed. In this week's issue of NLJ, Stacie Bourton, Tom Whittaker & Beata Kolodziej of Burges Salmon examine US rulings showing how easily privilege can be lost
New guidance seeks to bring order to the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Minesh Tanna and David Bridge of Simmons & Simmons set out a framework stressing ‘transparency’, ‘explainability’ and ‘reliability’
back-to-top-scroll