header-logo header-logo

04 November 2021
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Equality
printer mail-detail

Tackling misogyny & street harassment

Nottingham Law School lecturers have called for more creativity in changing attitudes to misogyny and street harassment
The lecturers said ‘far more needs to be done to tackle social attitudes and effect change, yet the government seems satisfied that there is nothing more to be done’. They pointed to recent comments from the Prime Minister that recording misogyny as hate crimes would place an extra strain on police officers and that there is already abundant legislation to tackle violence against women.

They also highlighted Justice Secretary Dominic Raab’s confusion last month about the meaning of ‘misogny’, when he said ‘misogyny is absolutely wrong whether it’s a man against a woman or a woman against a man’.

The lecturers said the issue had reached ‘epidemic proportions’ and needed to be tackled ‘at its root. Social attitudes need to change about what’s acceptable and what’s not. And when people don’t want to listen, communication needs to be far, far smarter to get them to engage and have a hope of changing their minds’.

One example of smarter communication, they said, was Police Scotland’s ‘Don’t be that guy’ video, which had a lot of traction on social media and received praise for highlighting that men, rather than women, need to take action to call out bad behaviour.

Nottingham Law School developed a cartoon-style educational tool to tackle the harassment of women and girls last year, along with Nottingham Trent University and University of Nottingham. The online comic strip, ‘Changing Minds’, used story-telling techniques to convey the impact of harassment on girls and women, the frequency of such behaviour, and how it fuels fear, damages wellbeing and causes women and girls to withdraw from public space.

The comic strip can be read here

Last year, the Law Commission proposed legislative reform to add ‘sex or gender’ to the protected characteristics for hate crime laws. The other characteristics are race, religion, sexual orientation, disability and transgender identity.

 

Categories: Legal News , Profession , Equality
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll