header-logo header-logo

Supreme Court accounts for another record year

07 July 2016
Issue: 7706 / Categories: Legal News , In Court
printer mail-detail

In the past year, the Supreme Court has witnessed an increase in both urgent hearings and cases requiring panels of more than five justices.

The court’s Annual Report and Accounts, laid before Parliament this week, reveals the Court sat as a panel of seven or nine in 14% of appeals in 2015/16 compared to 12% and 9% in the previous two years.

Larger panels tend to sit where the court is being asked to depart from a previous decision of the Supreme Court or House of Lords, or where a case raises an issue of particularly high constitutional or public importance. The report shows the number of urgent cases—where initial application proceeds to full judgment within weeks—rose from three in 2014-15 to nine this year.

In total, the court heard 92 appeals in 104 days, and delivered 81 judgments. There were more decisions relating to children, tax and tort law than in previous years.

Unusually, there were no cases considering detention or extradition issues. Permission to appeal was granted in 32% of cases.

Issue: 7706 / Categories: Legal News , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll