header-logo header-logo

04 December 2008 / Janna Purdie
Issue: 7348 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Summary judgment

JANNA PURDIE provides practical guidance for  practitioners involved in summary judgment applications

References

Jacobs v Skidmore [2008] All ER (D) 258 (Nov)
Jacobs v Skidmore [2008] All ER (D) 258 (Nov)
CPR 24

Summary judgment
There are obvious steps parties can take to make the court process easier and  strengthen their case. Mr Justice Coulson, in a judgment providing valuable guidance  to practitioners, has highlighted some of these. While some apply specifi cally  to summary judgment applications others apply equally well to other forms of  applications.

Facts of the case

The claimant undertook quantity surveying and project management for a  construction project under a consultancy agreement. The defendant terminated that  agreement and the claimant brought proceedings for unpaid invoices of more than  £4m.

The claimant applied for summary judgment on three of the invoices totalling  £755,643.60. The application was resisted. The time estimate was two hours with no  indication that pre-reading was required. The evidence adduced comprised 10 files, and  included lengthy statements. The application took three days of court time.

The summary judgment

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll