header-logo header-logo

Summary judgment

04 December 2008 / Janna Purdie
Issue: 7348 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

JANNA PURDIE provides practical guidance for  practitioners involved in summary judgment applications

References

Jacobs v Skidmore [2008] All ER (D) 258 (Nov)
Jacobs v Skidmore [2008] All ER (D) 258 (Nov)
CPR 24

Summary judgment
There are obvious steps parties can take to make the court process easier and  strengthen their case. Mr Justice Coulson, in a judgment providing valuable guidance  to practitioners, has highlighted some of these. While some apply specifi cally  to summary judgment applications others apply equally well to other forms of  applications.

Facts of the case

The claimant undertook quantity surveying and project management for a  construction project under a consultancy agreement. The defendant terminated that  agreement and the claimant brought proceedings for unpaid invoices of more than  £4m.

The claimant applied for summary judgment on three of the invoices totalling  £755,643.60. The application was resisted. The time estimate was two hours with no  indication that pre-reading was required. The evidence adduced comprised 10 files, and  included lengthy statements. The application took three days of court time.

The summary judgment was partly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll