header-logo header-logo

22 May 2008 / Mark Ryan
Issue: 7322 / Categories: Features , Public , Procedure & practice , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Sum of constituent parts

Will the government's constitutional reforms make state power more accountable? Mark Ryan reports

In July 2007, Jack Straw MP, the secretary of state for justice and lord chancellor, unveiled a green paper (The Governance of Britain, Cm 7170) which set out to promote “a national conversation” on even further reform of the constitution. The foreword stated that the government wanted “to forge a new relationship between government and citizen, and begin the journey towards a new constitutional settlement—a settlement that entrusts parliament and the people with more power”. In particular, the green paper was concerned with making state power more accountable and enhancing citizens' rights and responsibilities. This was followed by the publication of consultation documents designed to engage the public and other interested parties in shaping the proposed constitutional changes.

On 25 March 2008, Straw made a statement in the House of Commons about the government's programme of constitutional renewal and he announced the publication of three documents:

  •   
    ●     A white paper on constitutional renewal (The Governance of Britain—Constitutional
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll