header-logo header-logo

Suicide battle

19 June 2008
Issue: 7326 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Mental health
printer mail-detail

In brief

A multiple sclerosis sufferer has won her fight to bring a High Court challenge to clarify the law on assisted suicide. Debbie Purdy wants to find out whether her husband would be prosecuted if he helps her travel abroad to commit suicide. Lord Justice Latham, sitting with Mr Justice Nelson, ruled that “without wishing to give Ms Purdy any optimism that her arguments will ultimately succeed”, she did have an arguable case. They gave her leave to challenge the reluctance by the Director of Public Prosecutions to spell out a clear policy on whether people might be prosecuted if they help loved ones die. Sir Ken Macdonald maintains there is no set policy for assisted suicide, and he cannot grant immunity from prosecution.

Issue: 7326 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Mental health
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll