header-logo header-logo

Stressed out

25 March 2010 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7410 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Michael Salter & Chris Bryden provide an update on workplace stress

Workplace stress is an all-too-common occurrence, which can have a significant effect on both physical and mental health. Defined by the Health and Safety Executive as “the adverse reaction people have to excessive pressures or other types of demand placed on them”, it is also a fertile source of litigation.

Workplace stress claims do not fall neatly into any particular discipline within the law. Certainly such claims can, and commonly do, give rise to capability dismissals, but in the employment field are more likely to be brought either as constructive unfair dismissals or disability discrimination claims.

Duty of care

Outside of the employment field, a claim for stress-related illness usually is brought in negligence, based upon the duty of care owed by employers to take reasonable steps to protect their employees.

Since 2002 the position relating to workplace stress has been relatively well established. In Sutherland v Hatton [2002] ICR 613 (CA) the Court of Appeal established a number of factors applicable

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll