header-logo header-logo

Strange but true

11 March 2010 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7408 / Categories: Blogs , Practice areas
printer mail-detail

Dominic Regan casts a wry eye over some unusual cases..

When I was a little boy my mother took me to a talk given by a wise old man, Professor Ian Smith. Two things have always stayed with me. I had never heard profanities before and he said that in English law truth was stranger than anything one could ever invent. He was right as usual.

Over the years I have come across so many odd cases. Here are some of them. None are apocryphal. All are reported.

Our judiciary is the envy of the world. Read Garratt v Saxby (2004) 1 WLR 2152, [2004] All ER (D) 302 (Feb) and you will see why. The trial judge was inadvertently made aware of a payment into court at the start of the trial. This detail should only be revealed when all issues had been concluded. His ingenious solution? He ordered himself to forget it! I have a vision of the defendants saying you can’t do that and the judge asking “forget what?” Anyway, it

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll