header-logo header-logo

20 February 2015 / Sara Wyeth , Anton van Dellen
Issue: 7641 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Stitched up?

wyeth

Manufacture at your risk, say Dr Anton van Dellen & Sara Wyeth

When a manufacturer supplies to a wholesaler, to what extent should the manufacturer be held responsible for events involving a wholesaler and an end-retailer? This question was considered by the Court of Appeal in the recent case of Confectia v Miss Mania [2014] EWCA Civ 1484.

Who bears the risk?

Confectia is a manufacturer of clothing based in Romania. It agreed to supply clothing to Miss Mania, a wholesaler based in the UK. Miss Mania proceeded to supply garments to a number of retailers, one of whom, Perera, refused to pay for the goods on the grounds of quality after delivery from Miss Mania. However, Miss Mania either took no steps or inadequate and insufficient steps to recover the goods from Perera and Perera was struck off almost a year later.

The issue before the court was whether the insolvency of a retailer was reasonably contemplatable as a serious possibility at the time of contracting within the rule in Hadley

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll