header-logo header-logo

Staying away for an RTA

19 October 2010
Issue: 7436 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line
printer mail-detail

Will district judges find it of assistance to hear oral argument as to quantum...

Will district judges find it of assistance to hear oral argument as to quantum at stage 3 of the new road traffic personal injury claim process? Generally, are there any particular advantages or disadvantages to the parties in being legally represented at such a hearing?

The process is designed to work efficiently without an oral hearing. Given that the process is restricted to claims of plus £1,000 to £10,000 and the extent of the written information and documentation which will be before the District Judge, oral submissions and the citing of a selection of published decisions of other judges is unlikely to be of great benefit to either side.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll