header-logo header-logo

08 May 2008
Issue: 7320 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Procedure & practice , Property
printer mail-detail

Statwatch

News

Discretionary Housing Payments (Grants) Amendment Order 2008 (SI 2008/1167)

Commences 22 May 2008. Amends SI 2008/1167 to remove the statutory requirement for local authorities to have their final claim for the secretary of state’s contribution towards discretionary housing payments audited. The amendments are applicable from 1 April 2006.

 

Immigration (Biometric Registration) (Pilot) Regulations 2008 (SI 2008/1183) Commenced 1 May 2008.

Enable the secretary of state to operate a pilot for issuing “biometric immigration documents”—also known as an identity card—for foreign nationals. The pilot is designed to test the biometric enrolment processes before further regulations are made for the main roll out of the project. Require certain persons who are subject to immigration control to apply for a biometric immigration document when they make an application for leave to remain in the UK. The person may be required to provide biometric information, including fingerprints and a photograph of their face. The Border and Immigration Agency will not issue an identity card for the purposes of this limited pilot. Where an applicant is successful, they will be issued a biometric immigration document that will be in the form of a vignette.

 

Medicines for Human Use (Prescribing) (Miscellaneous Amendments) Order 2008 (SI 2008/1161)

Commences 4 June 2008. Introduces independent prescribing by optometrists and enables hospitals and health centres to sell, offer for sale or supply medicines in accordance with the written directions of an optometrist independent prescriber. Optometrists who wish to undertake independent prescribing responsibilities must undertake training provided by a higher education institution and be accredited by the General Optical Council. Practitioners will need to register their independent prescribing specialty with the council before they can exercise prescribing responsibilities.

 

Issue: 7320 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Procedure & practice , Property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll